Ins & Outs of the Proposed House v. NCAA Settlement w/ Professor Sam Ehrlich
On this episode of Conduct Detrimental: THE Sports Law Podcast, Dan Lust (@SportsLawLust) and Mike Kravchenko (Find him on YouTube) are joined by special guest Sam Ehrlich (@samcehrlich) to bring you updates and insights into the proposed settlement in the House v. NCAA case. The trio discussed the intricacies of the settlement, which spans 133 pages, and aimed to break it down for the lovely listeners in an engaging and accessible manner. The conversation delves into the significant components of the settlement, including back pay for athletes, the proposed revenue-sharing model, and the enforcement of NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) deals. In this, highlights the complexities of enforcing fair market value for NIL deals, a contentious point brought up by Livvy Dunne’s mother, who criticized the requirement for athletes to report payments over $600 for approval. The discussion underscored the challenges of balancing athlete compensation with competitive fairness and the evolving legal landscape. While the settlement attempts to address numerous issues, it leaves many questions unanswered, particularly regarding Title IX implications and the potential need for collective bargaining. *** Have a topic you want to write about? ANYONE and EVERYONE can publish for ConductDetrimental.com. Let us know if you want to join the team. *** As always, this episode is sponsored by Themis Bar Review: https://www.themisbarsocial.com/conductdetrimental *** Host: Dan Lust (@SportsLawLust) Co-Host/Producer: Mike Kravchenko (Find him on YouTube) Featuring: Sam Ehrlich (@samcehrlich) Twitter | Instagram | TikTok | YouTube | Website | Email