176 - Nerve Pain and Frequency Specific Microcurrent Effectiveness

frequencyspecific.com   fsmsports365.com Hosts: Carolyn McMakin, MA, DC Kim Pittis, LCSP, (PHYS), MT 00:00 Introduction to Symmetry and FSM 00:25 Welcome and Introduction of Hosts 01:01 Discussing Nerve Pain and FSM Effectiveness 03:56 Exploring Current Types and Their Effects 05:31 Case Study: Treating Ovarian Cysts and Nerve Pain 10:38 Understanding Shoulder Pain and Its Origins 26:22 Biomechanics and Athletic Injuries 30:55 Complex Patient Cases and Treatment Strategies 33:31 Adrenal Support and Diurnal Rhythm 34:16 Ayurvedic Medicine and Cortisol Management 35:05 Exercise-Induced Asthma and Cortisol 35:49 Adrenal Failure and Treatment Plan 36:47 Challenges in FSM Protocols 38:28 Patient Stories and Treatment Insights 39:16 FSM Treatment Techniques and Approaches 41:10 Understanding Pain and Trigger Points 42:20 FSM in Practice: Case Studies 51:51 Collaborative Learning in FSM 55:01 Concluding Remarks and Future Sessions In the ever-evolving world of medical treatments, practitioners often find themselves grappling with complex issues like nerve pain that are unresponsive to conventional care. Frequency Specific Microcurrent (FSM) offers a breakthrough solution for these challenges, providing effective treatment options for conditions that were once deemed intractable. Below, we explore practical insights and techniques that medical practitioners can incorporate into their practice, drawn from experiences in using FSM to address nerve pain. The Challenge of Identifying Treatment Effectiveness When patients do not visibly feel the effects of FSM during treatment, it raises the question of how practitioners can ascertain if the therapy is working. Initial pain relief is an evident indicator; however, alternative markers such as improved range of motion or delayed onset of pain alleviation can also signal effectiveness. Practitioners should encourage patients to monitor their pain levels and range of motion post-treatment to evaluate its impact. Managing Expectations and Exploring Options Chronic nerve pain may not always yield immediate relief. Practitioners must advise patients that while the effects may not be instant, a progressive approach—evaluating changes over the course of hours or days—is essential. This ensures that patients understand FSM is one tool among many, aiding practitioners to pivot in treatment approaches as necessary to suit individual needs. Current Type and Frequency Decisions Not all FSM treatments are identical, with varying currents and frequencies applicable based on the patient profile. The choice between alternating and polarized positive currents can affect treatment outcomes, and starting with default protocols like alternating for non-athletes or polarized positive for athletes can be beneficial. Continuous assessment and adaptation of these settings based on patient response form an integral part of personalized FSM therapy. The Complexity and Fluidity of Pain Diagnosis Practitioners often encounter patients with multifaceted conditions where nerve pain is only one symptom. It’s crucial to distinguish whether pain originates from nerve damage or other structural or musculoskeletal issues. For instance, pain labeled as nerve-related might sometimes result from facet joint issues or disc problems. Thus, thorough evaluations and applying the specific currents and frequencies designed for these conditions are vital for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Treatment Strategies for Recurrent and Complex Pain Those practicing FSM should also recognize that symptoms can sometimes resurface, suggesting underlying issues were not fully resolved. This necessitates a proactive approach in evaluating and adjusting treatment plans based on ongoing patient feedback and reevaluation of initial diagnoses.  Importance of Education and Continuous Learning Treating nerve pain effectively with FSM involves understanding both the body’s physiology and the patient’s individual experience. Continuous learning and application of FSM protocols ensure practitioners keep abreast of best practices, thus providing patients with comprehensive care.  By integrating these insights into practice, medical professionals can enhance treatment regimens involving Frequency Specific Microcurrent to manage nerve pain and related conditions, ultimately offering their patients improved quality of care and hopeful recovery outcomes.

Om Podcasten

Frequency Specific Microcurrent was developed by Dr. Carolyn McMakin in 1995 using frequencies passed on from an osteopath in Canada who had a practice that came with a machine made in the 1920s. Dr. McMakin has written two books, "Frequency Specific Microcurrent in Pain Management" and "The Resonance Effect". Dr. McMakin has taught over 4000 medical practitioners FSM in her courses and has a new FSM clinic in Troutdale Oregon. Kim Pittis teaches the FSM Sports Course and has a private clinical practice where she works with some of the top athletes in the world. fsmsports365.com DISCLAIMER: The Frequency Specific Microcurrent Podcast (the “FSM Podcast”) has been produced by Frequency Specific Seminars (FSS) for entertainment, educational, and informational purposes only. The information and opinions provided in the Podcast (i) are not medical advice; (ii) do not create any type of doctor-patient relationship; and (iii) unless expressly stated, do not reflect the opinions of its affiliates, subsidiaries, or sponsors or the host’s or any podcast guests or affiliated professional organizations. No person should act or refrain from acting on the basis of the content provided in any Podcast without first seeking appropriate medical advice and counseling. No information provided in any Podcast should be used as a substitute for personalized medical advice and counseling. FSS expressly disclaims any and all liability relating to any actions taken or not taken based on any or all contents of this Podcast.