Impacts of prolonged intracranial catheter dwell time

Observations from practice and data analysis have shown that the duration of mechanical thrombectomy procedures are a strong predictor of outcome even with successful procedures. A large multicenter study was conducted which gives insight into choices between catheter types, and strategic decisions to be made during prolonged procedures. Dr Felipe C. Albuquerque, Editor-in-Chief of JNIS, interviews Dr. Ali Alawieh¹ and Dr. Alejandro Spiotta²,  two authors of the paper:  Prolonged intracranial catheter dwell time exacerbates penumbral stress and worsens stroke thrombectomy outcomes   1. Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 2. Med Univ S Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA   Please subscribe to the JNIS podcast on your favourite platform to get the latest podcast every month. If you enjoy our podcast, you can leave us a review or a comment on Apple Podcasts (https://apple.co/4aZmlpT) or Spotify (https://spoti.fi/3UKhGT5). We'd love to hear your feedback on social media - @JNIS_BMJ.

Om Podcasten

The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) Podcast is your source for a comprehensive look at the latest scientific research and literature in the field of neurointerventional surgery. Hosted by Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Felipe C. Albuquerque, each episode features in-depth interviews with authors and leading experts. Stay informed on the latest neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumours, and spinal disorders. Subscribe here or listen on your favourite podcast platform. JNIS - jnis.bmj.com - is published by BMJ on behalf of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. * The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. The content of this podcast does not constitute medical advice and it is not intended to function as a substitute for a healthcare practitioner’s judgement, patient care or treatment. The views expressed by contributors are those of the speakers. BMJ does not endorse any views or recommendations discussed or expressed on this podcast. Listeners should also be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. By listening to this podcast, listeners agree not to use its content as the basis for their own medical treatment or for the medical treatment of others.