#28: Make Risk-Based Approach Great Again with Eduardo Ustaran

There's no such thing as too much talk about Schrems II, right? Tune in for our talk with the absolute expert on this topic, Eduardo Ustaran. We discuss the current state of international data transfers and when we can expect the new transfer deal to be finalized.   Eduardo tells us his learnings from assessing third country privacy laws: every country has some sort of surveillance regime in place, but when are the safeguards imposed on it sufficient in the EU's eyes? And of course, lots of talk about assessing risk in data transfers. We are not done with the risk based approach yet.   Eduardo also brings us greetings from IAPP's Brussels Congress, where he had the chance to discuss the Schrems II decision with Schrems himself. Should we already be expecting a Schrems III decision?   Recording of Schrems & Ustaran conversation moderated by Caitlin Fennessy at IAPP Brussels: https://iapp.org/news/video/schrems-ii-the-eu-us-dpf-stakeholders-volley-iapp-europe-data-protection-congress-2022/    We would love to get feedback – so please tag us, follow us, DM us, or send us traditional email: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PodPrivacy, #privacypod Instagram: @privacypod LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tietosuojapod/about/ Email: tietosuojapod@protonmail.com

Om Podcasten

PrivacyPod is a podcast about privacy, technology and cookies, GDPR and beyond. Surprisingly unprofessional, seventh-best privacy podcast out there. Come for the privacy news and expert interviews, stay for the memes. Weekly episodes, subscribe on your podcast app to PrivacyPod for episodes in English, TietosuojaPod for episodes in Finnish. Regular cast: ⭐ Floora Kukorelli, ⭐ Hannes Saarinen, ⭐ Jyri Poutala ⭐ Heikki Tolvanen, ⭐ Laura Tarhonen, ⭐ Milla Keller, ⭐ Panu Pökkylä, ⭐ Pilvi Alopaeus. Under We also cover the latest privacy news and provide somewhat expert commentary on it. The show is suitable for all people interested in privacy, regardless of level of expertise. We do our best to talk "human" instead of lawyerisms.