S — Nietzsche Part 2: What is Happiness (And Can It Be Measured Scientifically)?

What is happiness? Is it even worth pursuing? Is a happy life different from a meaningful one? In this episode I try to clear up some confusion surrounding the word “happiness”. We typically think of happiness as being synonymous with positive emotion—joy, bliss, excitement, all of those kinds of emotions—but Nietzsche hates this. He tends to define true happiness as involving a strong sense of meaning or purpose and he tends to harshly criticize anyone who ignores this component of happiness. And indeed, the science does seem to align with him on this point. I compare Nietzsche’s criticisms of this purely hedonic happiness with the founder of modern positive psychology, Martin Seligman’s PERMA theory of human well-being in addition to my usual exploration of what these issues have to do with everyday people like you and me. Some Sources/Further Reading: The Portable Nietzsche edited and translated by Walter Kaufmann Basic Writings of Nietzsche edited and translated by Walter Kaufmann Bett, Richard. “Nietzsche, the Greeks, and Happiness (with Special Reference to Aristotle and Epicurus).” Philosophical Topics, vol. 33, no. 2, 2005, pp. 45–70. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/43154726.  Existentialism by Robert Solomon From Rationalism to Existentialism: The Existentialists and Their Nineteenth-century Backgrounds by Robert Solomon Spirituality for the Skeptic: The Thoughtful Love of Life by Robert Solomon Nietzsche: A Very Short Introduction by Michael Tanner Happiness: A History by Darrin M. McMahon Stumbling on Happiness by Daniel Gilbert Flourish (A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being) by Marin Seligman Is a Happy Life Different From a Meaningful Life? Take the PERMA-profiler Featured Music: Monplaisir — Everything is true  Rex Orange County — UNO 

Om Podcasten

Welcome to The Science of Philosophy where we evaluate philosophic ideas scientifically. Nearly every philosopher throughout history makes claims about the world which trespass overtly into the realm of science. But we know that if we want to arrive at the truth, just thinking about it or scraping together a few biased anecdotes is utterly inadequate in getting there. Therefore, if philosophy is ever going to be more than the mere asking of questions, which art often does better anyway, it has to integrate science into itself. That is the spirit with which this podcast will embark. Each episode we'll go through the philosophy of an idea or a particular thinker and see what the relevant scientific research has to say about it. Some ideas will be proven correct, some will remain ambiguous, and some will be flat out wrong. If this sounds like something that could be valuable to you, feel free to listen and subscribe. Tarek Zaher is a PhD student studying political philosophy. You can find him on twitter @Zaher_Tarek.